Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 14:19

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
NASA Hides The Emmy It Just Won (Update) - NASA Watch
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The everyday activity that can reveal your brain’s age - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Review: At $349, AMD’s 16GB Radeon RX 9060 XT is the new midrange GPU to beat - Ars Technica
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Texas governor vetoes hemp ban bill - Politico
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Pokémon Go Fest 2025 event habitat spawns and bonuses - Polygon
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Why are the bands Smashmouth and Nickelback often used as punchlines?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
The FC Bayern squad for the Club World Cup - FC Bayern Munich